Banner
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Welcome to the Heat Treating Forum.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: Heat Treating Forum > Support (Q&A) > Quality > Ams 2770 interpretation

Ams 2770 interpretation
Search this Thread
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 06-22-2010, 11:48 AM
pattonrm Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2
Default Ams 2770 interpretation

I am working with AMS 2770 and am having difficulty interpreting the number of solution re-heat treatments allowed. We typically work with clad aluminum sheetmetal thicknesses between .020" and .125". The spec states that these parts are "limited to one additional solution heat treatment in addition to any by the raw material producer". If we receive material in O condition, it has not been solution heat treated at the mill. Therefore, am I allowed to perform (2) solution heat treatments, or am I limited to (1) treatment, regardless of what happens at the mill?

This part of the spec seems very vague to me, and open to much interpretation. I am wondering what others are doing and how you may deal with rework situations (such as an interrupted solution cycle, overaged parts, or solution heat treated parts that are not formed within the allowed time after quench) and the determinination of how many re-solution treatments are allowed.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-22-2010, 01:00 PM
The Heat Treat Doctor Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 19
Cool Re: Ams 2770 interpretation

I have a great deal of experience working with Aluminum heat treating and on interpreting related AMS specifications (AMS 2770, AMS 2771, AMS 2750, etc.) and I would be more than happy to help out either here on line or via e-mail.

As to your specific question, you are allowed only one (1) resolution tratment on material received in the O condition. As you summarized, the specification clearly states that you are limited to only one...

I do not find the specifications vague, but then again I have worked with them for many years. They are not intended to be "open to interpretation". Respectfully, they must be read carefully and each word conveys it's intent. Rework is a serious matter and great deal of care taken so that the end result is a quality product.

Good luck,
__________________
Dan

Daniel H. Herring
"The Heat Treat Doctor"
The HERRING GROUP, Inc.
P. O. Box 884
Elmhurst, IL 60126-0884
Tel: 630.834.3017
Fax: 630.834.3117
Cell: 630.640.9048
iPhone: 630.804.9414

E-mail: dherring@heat-treat-doctor.com
E-mail: dherring@ameritech.net or theherringgroup@ameritech.net
Web: www.heat-treat-doctor.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-23-2010, 05:27 AM
pattonrm Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2
Default Re: Ams 2770 interpretation

I appreciate the response. I am still not 100% clear though.

So for material in O condition, do we get 1 solution heat treatment, or do we get 1 solution heat treatment and 1 re-solution treatment.

Since annealing is similar to solution heat treatment, except without the quench, is the annealing at the mill to O considered as one of the solution treatements?

Am I making this interpretation more comlicated that it needs to be? Is it simpler to say, regardless of what the process is at the mill, we get (O) treatments for .020" material, (1) treatement for .020"-.125" material, and (2) treatments for material greater than .125"?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-27-2010, 06:04 PM
DrOrpheus Offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 58
Default Re: Ams 2770 interpretation

I believe you as a heat treater are limited to solution treating it one time and one time only if supplied in the solution treated condition. Not too knowledgeable on aluminum, but with stainless alloys, that's how it is. I think they should loosen up a little on these requirements in certain situations, such as raw stock and sheet. If you get a sub par batch from the mill to be aged with tensile requirements, and they fall low or don't meet the elongation requirements, you gotta make sure you hit it on the nuts the 2nd time because there are no more solution treatments left, and some only give you one re-age along with your re-solution, which makes it more difficult.
Reply With Quote
   
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
 
Forum Links
You are here:
Heat Treating Forum > Support (Q&A) > Quality > Ams 2770 interpretation
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Banner
Top
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:44 AM.
Copyright © 2009 www.heattreatforum.com